Home  ›  Ecosystem Disservices Research a Review of the State of the Art With a Focus on Cities

Ecosystem Disservices Research a Review of the State of the Art With a Focus on Cities

Written By Saturday, May 7, 2022 Add Comment Edit

Abstruse

As much as people benefit from the ecosystem services provided by nature, ecosystem disservices also impact daily lives. This is especially truthful for many urban communities in the Global S due to (1) the frequently greater diversity of ecosystem disservices and (2) higher vulnerabilities, which together tin can lead to greater impacts of ecosystem disservices in many Global Due south settings. This affiliate provides an overview of the electric current understandings of urban ecosystem disservices and their assessment and management with an emphasis on the Global Due south, albeit with reference to the Global North where useful. This overview reveals a lack of detailed and systematic empirical research on urban ecosystem disservices mostly, but even more then in the Global South, despite the greater diverseness and vulnerability in Global S settings. This needs to exist best-selling in urban environmental framings of urban dynamics in the Global South and translated into better integration of both ecosystem services and disservices within mutual research, policy or management frameworks. It is only through such integration that appropriate context-relevant policy directions and management options tin can be identified, thereby promoting the wellbeing of urban citizens in the Global South.

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Ecosystem disservices
  • Impacts
  • Urban
  • Vulnerability

References

  • Adegun OB (2018) When greenish is grievous: downsides in human-nature interactions in breezy urban settlements. J Urban 11:347–361

    Google Scholar

  • Adger N (2006) Vulnerability. Glob Enviro Change xvi:268–281

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Agbenyega O, Burgess PJ, Cook M, Morris J (2009) Application of an ecosystem office framework to perceptions of community woodlands. Land Use Politico 26:551–557

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Alexander K, Truslove 1000, Davis R, Stephens Southward, Zentz R (2020) A collaborative approach to preparing for and reacting to emerald ash borer: a example study from Colorado. For 93:239–253

    Google Scholar

  • Andersson Eastward, McPhearson T, Kremer P, Gomez-Baggethun Eastward, Haase D, Tuvendal M, Wurster D (2015) Scale and context dependence of ecosystem service providing units. Ecosys Serv 12:157–164

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Arnold Due east (2012) Pollution-load zones of allergic tree pollen in Boston. Ecol Lett 8:1218–1234

    Google Scholar

  • Atangana A (2020) Modelling the spread of COVID-nineteen with new fractal-fractional operators: can the lockdown save mankind before vaccination? Chaos Solitons Fractals 136:109860

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Baró F, Chaparro L, Gómez-Baggethun E, Langemeyer J, Nowak DJ, Terradas J (2014) Contribution of ecosystem services to air quality and climate change mitigation policies: the case of urban forests in Barcelona, Espana. Ambio 43:466–479

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Barua Yard, Bhagwat SA, Jadhav S (2013) The hidden dimensions of human–wildlife conflict: health impacts, opportunity and transaction costs. Biol Conserv 157:309–316

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Bastian O, Haase D, Grunewald K (2012) Ecosystem properties, potentials and services–The EPPS conceptual framework and an urban application example. Ecol Indic 21:seven–16

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Belaire JA, Westphal LM, Whelan CJ, Pocket-sized ES (2015) Urban residents' perceptions of birds in the neighbourhood: biodiversity, cultural ecosystem services, and disservices. Condor 117:192–202

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Bhutta ZA, Sommerfeld J, Lassi ZS, Salam RA, Das JK (2014) Global burden, distribution and interventions for infectious diseases of poverty. Infect Dis Poverty iii:21

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Blanco J, Dendoncker N, Barnaud C, Sirami C (2019) Ecosystem disservices matter: towards their systematic integration within ecosystem service enquiry and policy. Ecosys Serv 36:100913

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Blunt SM (2008) Trees and pavements—are they compatible? Arboric J 31:73–80

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Bombieri G, Naves J, Penteriani V, Selva North, Fernández-Gil A, López-Bao JV, Ambarli H, Bautista C, Bespalova T, Bobrov V, Bolshakov V (2019) Brown carry attacks on humans: a worldwide perspective. Sci Rep 9:1–10

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Bosch-Cano F, Bernard N, Sudre B, Gillet F, Thibaudon M, Richard H, Badot PM, Ruffaldi P (2011) Man exposure to allergenic pollens: a comparing between urban and rural areas. Enviro Res 111:619–625

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Boyd IL, Freer-Smith PH, Gilligan CA, Godfray HCJ (2013) The consequence of tree pests and diseases for ecosystem services. Sci 342:6160

    Google Scholar

  • Brun Yard, Di Pietro F, Bonthoux S (2018) Residents' perceptions and valuations of urban wastelands are influenced by vegetation structure. Urban For Urban Green 29:393–403

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, Müller F (2012) Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecol Indic 21:17–29

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Cariñanos P, Calaza-Martínez P, O'Brien L, Calfapietra C (2017) The cost of greening: disservices of urban trees. In: Pearlmutter D, Calfapietra C, Samson R, O'Brien L, Ostoic SK (eds) The urban woods. Springer, Cham, pp 79–87

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Cariñanos P, Grilo F, Pinho P, Casares-Porcel M, Branquinho C, Acil N, Andreucci MB, Anjos A, Bianco PM, Brini South, Calaza-Martínez P (2019) Estimation of the allergenic potential of urban trees and urban parks: towards the healthy design of urban green spaces of the hereafter. Int J Enviro Res Public Heal 16:1357

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Cariñanos P, Ruiz-Peñuela S, Valle AM, De la Guardia CD (2020) Assessing pollination disservices of urban street-trees: the example of London-plane tree (Platanus x hispanica Mill. ex Münchh). Sci Total Enviro 737: 139722

    Google Scholar

  • Charles KE, Linklater WL (2013) Dietary breadth every bit a predictor of potential native avian–human conflict in urban landscapes. Wildl Res 40:482–489

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Chishaleshale M, Shackleton CM, Gambiza J, Gumbo D (2015) The prevalence of planning and management frameworks for copse and green spaces in urban areas of Due south Africa. Urban For Urban Light-green 14:817–825

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Cilliers J, Cilliers S (2015) From green to gilt: a South African example of valuing urban green spaces in some residential areas in Potchefstroom. Town Reg Programme 67:1–12

    Google Scholar

  • Cocks 1000, Alexander J, Mogano L, Vetter Due south (2016) Ways of belonging: meanings of ''nature'' amongst Xhosa-speaking township residents in South Africa. J Ethnobiol 36:820–841

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Cocks ML, Shackleton CM (2021) Diversities of nature in cities: enriching belonging, wellbeing and bioculture. Earthscan/Routledge, London

    Google Scholar

  • Costello LR, McPherson EG, Burger DW, Perry EJ, Kelley D (2000) Strategies to reduce infrastructure damage by tree roots: a symposium for researchers and practitioners. In: Proceedings of a Symposium. Western Affiliate, International Gild of Arboriculture, Cohasset, CA

    Google Scholar

  • Cowett FD, Bassuk N (2017) Street tree variety in iii northeastern US states. Arboric Urb for 43:1–14

    Google Scholar

  • Cox DT, Hudson HL, Plummer KE, Siriwardena GM, Anderson K, Hancock South, Devine-Wright P, Gaston KJ (2018) Covariation in urban birds providing cultural services or disservices and people. J Appl Ecol 55:2308–2319

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • D'amato G (2000) Urban air pollution and plant-derived respiratory allergy. Clin Exp Allergy 30:628–636

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Dalu MT, Shackleton CM (2018) The potential use of natural resource in urban informal settlements as substitutes for financial upper-case letter during flooding emergencies. Phys Chem World 104:18–27

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Dalu MT, Shackleton CM, Dalu T (2018) Influence of country encompass, proximity to streams and household topographical location on flooding impact in the Eastern Cape, Due south Africa. Intn J Disast Take chances Red 28:481–490

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Del Toro I, Ribbons RR, Pelini SL (2012) The little things that run the earth revisited: a review of ant-mediated ecosystem services and disservices (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol News 17:133–146

    Google Scholar

  • Delshammar T, Östberg J, Öxell C (2015) Urban Trees and ecosystem disservices—a pilot report using complaints records from 3 Swedish cities. Arboric Urb For 41:187–193

    Google Scholar

  • Díaz Due south, Demissew S, Carabias J, Joly C, Lonsdale M, Ash Northward, Larigauderie A, Adhikari JR, Arico South, Báldi A, Bartuska A (2015) The IPBES conceptual framework: connecting nature and people. Curr Opin Enviro Sustain fourteen:1–16

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Díaz Due south, Pascual U, Stenseke Yard, Martín-López B, Watson RT, Molnár Z, Colina R, Chan KM, Drip IA, Brauman KA, Polasky S, Church A, Lonsdale M, Larigauderie A, Leadley PW, Van Oudenhoven APE, Van der Plaat F, Schröter Grand, Lavorel South, Aumeeruddy-Thomas Y, Bukvareva E, Davies K, Demissew South, Erpul Thou, Failler P, Guerra CA, Hewitt CL, Keune H, Lindley S, Shirayama Y (2018) Assessing nature'southward contributions to people. Sci 359(6373):270–272

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Dickie IA, Bennett BM, Burrows LE, Nunez MA, Peltzer DA, Porté A, Richardson DM, Rejmánek M, Rundel PW, Van Wilgen BW (2014) Conflicting values: ecosystem services and invasive tree management. Biol Inv xvi:705–719

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Dobbs C, Escobedo FJ, Zipperer WC (2011) A framework for developing urban forest ecosystem services and goods indicators. Landsc Urb Plan 99:196–206

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Dobbs C, Kendal D, Nitschke CR (2014) Multiple ecosystem services and disservices of the urban wood establishing their connections with landscape structure and sociodemographics. Ecol Indic 43:44–55

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Dobbs C, Vasquez A, Olave P, Olave Thousand (2021) Cultural urban ecosystem services. In: Shackleton CM, Cilliers, SS, Davoren Eastward, du Toit MJ (eds) Urban environmental in the Global South. Springer, Cham, pp 245–264

    Google Scholar

  • Donovan GH, Prestemon JP (2012) The effect of trees on offense in Portland, Oregon. Enviro Behav 44:three–30

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Drescher AW, Isendahl C, Caridad Cruz Grand, Karg H, Menakanit A (2021) Urban and peri-urban agriculture in the Global South. In: Shackleton CM, Cilliers, SS, Davoren Due east, du Toit MJ (eds) Urban ecology in the Global S. Springer, Cham, pp 293–324

    Google Scholar

  • Dunn RR (2010) Global mapping of ecosystem disservices: the unspoken reality that nature sometimes kills us. Biotrop 42:555–557

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • EAACI (European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology) (2015) European university of allergy and clinical immunology (eaaci): advocacy manifesto tackling the allergy crisis in Europe—concerted policy activeness needed. http://www.eaaci.org/outreach/public-declarations.html. Accessed on 18 Aug 2020

  • Echeverri A, Naidoo R, Karp DS, Chan KM, Zhao J (2019) Iconic manakins and despicable grackles: comparison cultural ecosystem services and disservices beyond stakeholders in Republic of costa rica. Ecol Indic 106:105454

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Elam J, Björdal C (2020) A review and example studies of factors affecting the stability of wooden foundation piles in urban environments exposed to construction work. Int Biodeter Biodegrad 148:104913

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Escobedo FJ (2021) Understanding urban regulating ecosystem services in the Global South. In: Shackleton CM, Cilliers, SS, Davoren Due east, du Toit MJ (eds) Urban ecology in the Global South. Springer, Cham, pp 227–244

    Google Scholar

  • Escobedo FJ, Clerici N, Staudhammer CL, Feged-Rivadeneira A, Bohorquez JC, Tovar One thousand (2018) Trees and criminal offence in Bogota, Colombia: is the link an ecosystem disservice or service? Land Use Pol 78:583–592

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Escobedo FJ, Kroeger T, Wagner JE (2011) Urban forests and pollution mitigation: analysing ecosystem services and disservices. Enviro Pollut 159:2078–2087

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Froude MJ, Petley DN (2018) Global fatal landslide occurrence from 2004 to 2016. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 18:2161–2181

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Geneviève LD, Ray N, Chappuis F, Alcoba G, Mondardini MR, Bolon I, Ruiz de Castañeda R (2018) Participatory approaches and open data on venomous snakes: a neglected opportunity in the global snakebite crisis. PLOS Negl Trop Dis 12:e0006162

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Guo T, Morgenroth J, Conway T (2019) To plant, remove, or retain: understanding property possessor decisions almost trees during redevelopment. Landsc Urb Program 190:103601

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Gwedla N, Shackleton CM (2019) Perceptions and preferences for urban trees across multiple socio-economic contexts in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Landsc Urb Plan 189:225–234

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Haines-Young R, Potschin M (2013) Mutual international classification of ecosystem services (CICES): consultation on version 4, August-December 2012. EEA Framework contract No EEA/IEA/09/003. www.cices.eu

  • Halloran A, Magid J (2013) Planning the unplanned: incorporating agriculture equally an urban state use into the Dar es Salaam main program and beyond. Enviro 25:541–558

    Google Scholar

  • Harwood TD, Tomlinson I, Potter CA, Knight JD (2011) Dutch elm affliction revisited: past, nowadays and time to come direction in Great Uk. Plant Pathol 60:545–555

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Herd-Hoare S (2019) The relative role of ecosystem services and disservices in rural livelihoods in the Eastern Cape province, South Africa. Masters thesis, Rhodes University, Grahamstown

    Google Scholar

  • Hill L, Hemery G, Hector A, Brown N (2019) Maintaining ecosystem backdrop after loss of ash in Great United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland. J Appl Ecol 56:282–293

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Hofmann Grand, Westermann JR, Kowarik I, Van der Meer E (2012) Perceptions of parks and urban derelict land past landscape planners and residents. Urban For Urban Green eleven:303–312

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Jansson M, Fors H, Lindgren T, Wiström B (2013) Perceived personal safety in relation to urban woodland vegetation: a review. Urban For Urban Green (12):127–133

    Google Scholar

  • Jégh-Czinege North, Faragó T, Pongrácz P (2020) A bark of its own kind–the acoustics of 'abrasive' dog barks suggests a specific attention-evoking event for humans. Bioacoustics 29:210–225

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Keswani 1000 (2017) The practice of tree worship and the territorial product of urban space in the Indian neighbourhood. J Urb Des 22:370–387

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Kirkpatrick JB, Davison A, Daniels GD (2012) Resident attitudes towards trees influence the planting and removal of different types of copse in eastern Australian cities. Landsc Urb Plan 107:147–158

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Kuo Atomic number 26, Sullivan WC (2001) Environs and crime in the inner city: does vegetation reduce crime? Enviro Behav 33:343–367

    Google Scholar

  • Kuo FE, Bacaicoa 1000, Sullivan WC (1998) Transforming inner-city landscapes: copse, sense of safety, and preference. Enviro Behav 30:28–59

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Larson KL, Corley EA, Andrade R, Hall SJ, York AM, Meerow Southward, Coseo P, Childers DL, Hondula DM (2019) Subjective evaluations of ecosystem services and disservices. Ecol Soc 24(ii)

    Google Scholar

  • Lee-Smith D (2010) Cities feeding people: an update on urban agronomics in equatorial Africa. Enviro Urb 22:483–499

    Google Scholar

  • Li XP, Fan SX, Kühn Northward, Dong L, Hao PY (2019) Residents' ecological and aesthetical perceptions toward spontaneous vegetation in urban parks in China. Urban For Urban Green 44:126397

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Limburg KE, Luzadis VA, Ramsey G, Schulz KL, Mayer CM (2010) The adept, the bad, and the algae: Perceiving ecosystem services and disservices generated by zebra and quagga mussels. J Great Lakes Res 36:86–92

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim South, Shibuya K (+188 authors) (2012) Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Brunt of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 380(9859): 2095–2128

    Google Scholar

  • Lupindu AM, Olsen JE, Ngowi HA, Msoffe PL, Mtambo MM, Scheutz F, Dalsgaard A (2014) Occurrence and characterisation of shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157: H7 and other non-sorbitol–fermenting E. coli in cattle and humans in urban areas of Morogoro, Tanzania. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis fourteen:503–510

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Lyytimäki J (2014) Bad nature: Paper representations of ecosystem disservices. Urban For Urban Light-green 13:418–424

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Lyytimäki J (2015) Ecosystem disservices: embrace the catchword. Ecosys Serv 12:136

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Lyytimäki J (2017) Disservices of urban copse. In: Ferrini F, Konijnendijk van den Bosch CC, Fini A (eds) Routledge handbook of urban forestry. Routledge, New York, pp 164–176

    Google Scholar

  • Lyytimäki J, Sipilä M (2009) Hopping on one leg–the challenge of ecosystem disservices for urban light-green direction. Urban For Urban Green viii:309–315

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Lyytimäki J, Petersen LK, Normander B, Bezák P (2008) Nature as a nuisance? Ecosystem services and disservices to urban lifestyle. Enviro Sci v:161–172

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Maes J, Teller A, Erhard M, Liquete C, Braat 50, Berry P, Egoh B, Puydarrieux P,Fiorina C, Santos F, Paracchini ML, Keune H, Wittmer H, Hauck J, Fiala I, Verburg PH, Condé Due south, Schägner JP, San Miguel J, Estreguil C, Ostermann O, Barredo JI, Pereira HM, Stott A, Laporte V, Meiner A, Olah B, Royo Gelabert E, Spyropoulou R, Petersen JE, Maguire C, Zal N, Achilleos E, Rubin A, Ledoux L, Brown C, Raes C, Jacobs S, Vandewalle M, Connor D, Bidoglio G (2013) Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services. An analytical framework for ecosystem assessments under action five of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. Publications Role of the European Matrimony, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar

  • Mathey J, Arndt T, Banse J, Rink D (2018) Public perception of spontaneous vegetation on brownfields in urban areas: results from surveys in Dresden and Leipzig (Germany). Urban For Urban Green 29:384–392

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • McClintock N, Pallana East, Wooten H (2014) Urban livestock ownership, management, and regulation in the United States: An exploratory survey and research agenda. Land Use Political leader 38:426–440

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • McLellan V, Shackleton CM (2019) The relative representation of ecosystem services and disservices in South African newspaper media. Ecosys People 15:247–256

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • McPherson EG (2000) Expenditures associated with conflicts betwixt street tree root growth and hardscape in California, U.s.a.. J Arboric 26:289–297

    Google Scholar

  • McPherson EG, Simpson JR, Peper PJ, Maco SE, Gardner SL, Cozad SK, Xiao Q (2006) Midwest community tree guide: benefits, costs, and strategic planting. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-199. Section of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA

    Google Scholar

  • Mesa A, Arboit M, De Rosa C (2010) Solar obstruction assessment model for densely forested urban environments. Archit Sci Rev 53:224–237

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human wellbeing: synthesis. Isle Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar

  • Moro PA, Assisi F, Cassetti F, Bissoli M, Borghini R, Davanzo F, Della Puppa T, Dimasi V, Ferruzzi M, Giarratana T, Travaglia A (2009) Toxicological hazards of natural environments: clinical reports from Poisonous substance Control Centre of Milan. Urban For Urban Green 8:179–186

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Mouratidis K (2019) The impact of urban tree embrace on perceived safety. Urban For Urban Green 44:126434

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Mullaney J, Lucke T, Trueman SJ (2015) A review of benefits and challenges in growing street trees in paved urban environments. Landsc Urb Plan 134:157–166

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Nasar JL, Fisher B (1993) 'Hot spots' of fear and law-breaking: a multi-method investigation. J Enviro Psychol 13:187–206

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Nasar JL, Fisher B, Grannis One thousand (1993) Proximate physical cues to fear of crime. Landsc Urb Plan 26:161–178

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Nowak DJ, Crane DE, Stevens JC, Hoehn RE, Walton JT, Bond J (2008) A ground-based method of assessing urban forest structure and ecosystem services. Arboric Urb for 34:347–358

    Google Scholar

  • Ngulani T, Shackleton CM (2019) Use of public urban greenish spaces for spiritual services in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe. Urban For Urban Green 38:97–104

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • O'Farrell PJ, Donaldson JS, Hoffman MT (2007) The influence of ecosystem goods and services on livestock direction practices on the Bokkeveld plateau, South Africa. Agric Ecosys Enviro 122:312–324

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • O'Hare Chiliad, Rivas South (2005) The landslide hazard and human vulnerability in La Paz, Bolivia. Geog J 171:239–258

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Östberg J, Martinsson Grand, Stål Ö, Fransson AM (2012) Risk of root intrusion past tree and shrub species into sewer pipes in Swedish urban areas. Urban For Urban Green 11:65–71

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Ostoić SK, Van den Bosch CCK, Vuletić D, Stevanov M, Živojinović I, Mutabdžija-Bećirović S, Lazarević J, Stojanova B, Blagojević D, Stojanovska Grand, Nevenić R (2017) Citizens' perception of and satisfaction with urban forests and green space: results from selected Southeast European cities. Urban For Urban Green 23:93–103

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Paap T, Burgess TI, Wingfield MJ (2017) Urban copse: bridge-heads for forest pest invasions and sentinels for early detection. Biol Inv 19:3515–3526

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Paap T, De Beer ZW, Migliorini D, Nel WJ, Wingfield MJ (2018) The polyphagous shot hole borer (PSHB) and its fungal symbiont Fusarium euwallaceae: a new invasion in S Africa. Austral Plant Pathol 47:231–237

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Pataki DE, Carreiro MM, Cherrier J, Grulke NE, Jennings 5, Pincetl S, Pouyat RV, Whitlow Thursday, Zipperer WC (2011) Coupling biogeochemical cycles in urban environments: ecosystem services, light-green solutions, and misconceptions. Front end Ecol Enviro ix:27–36

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Pauleit S, Vasquéz A, Maruthaveeran South, Liu L, Cilliers SS (2021) Urban dark-green infrastructure in the Global South. In: Shackleton CM, Cilliers, SS, Davoren E, du Toit MJ (eds) Urban ecology in the Global South. Springer, Cham, pp 107–143

    Google Scholar

  • Pawankar R, Canonica GW, Holgate ST, Lockey RF, Blaiss M (eds) (2013)World Allergy Organisation (WAO) White book on allergy. Globe Allergy Arrangement, Wisconsin

    Google Scholar

  • Peñuelas J, Llusià J (2003) BVOCs: plant defense force against climate warming? Trends Plant Sci 8:105–109

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Pires AF, Peterson A, Baron JN, Adams R, Martínez-López B, Moore D (2019) Small and lawn livestock owners needs assessment in the western United States. PLoS Ane 14:0212372

    Google Scholar

  • Plieninger T, Dijks S, Oteros-Rozas E, Bieling C (2013) Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Politician 33:118–129

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Potgieter LJ, Gaertner Yard, Kueffer C, Larson BM, Livingstone SW, O'Farrell PJ, Richardson DM (2017) Alien plants as mediators of ecosystem services and disservices in urban systems: a global review. Biol Inv 19:3571–3588

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Potgieter LJ, Gaertner M, O'Farrell PJ, Richardson DM (2019a) A fine-scale assessment of the ecosystem service-disservice dichotomy in the context of urban ecosystems afflicted past alien plant invasions. For Ecosys six:46

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Potgieter LJ, Gaertner M, O'Farrell PJ, Richardson DM (2019b) Perceptions of impact: invasive alien plants in the urban surround. J Enviro Mgmt 229:76–87

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Randrup TB, McPherson EG, Costello LR (2001) Tree root intrusion in sewer systems: review of extent and costs. J Infrastruct Syst vii:26–31

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Richardson Eastward, Shackleton CM (2014) The extent and perceptions of vandalism as a crusade of street tree damage in small towns in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Urban For Urban Green 13:425–432

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Riley CB, Perry KI, Ard K, Gardiner MM (2018) Asset or liability? Ecological and sociological tradeoffs of urban spontaneous vegetation on vacant land in shrinking cities. Sustain x:2139

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Roman LA, Conway TM, Eisenman TS, Koeser AK, Ordóñez Barona C, Locke DH, Jenerette GD, Östberg J, Vogt J (2021) Across "trees are expert": disservices, direction costs, and tradeoffs in urban forestry. Ambio 50:615–630

    Google Scholar

  • Roy Due south, Byrne J, Pickering C (2012) A systematic quantitative review of urban tree benefits, costs, and cess methods across cities in unlike climatic zones. Urban For Urban Dark-green 11:351–363

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Sandbrook CG, Burgess ND (2015) Biodiversity and ecosystem services: non all positive. Ecosys Serv 12:29

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Saunders ME, Luck GW (2016) Limitations of the ecosystem services versus disservices dichotomy. Conserv Biol xxx:1363–1365

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Schaubroeck T (2017) A need for equal consideration of ecosystem disservices and services when valuing nature; countering arguments against disservices. Ecosys Serv 26:95–97

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Shackleton CM (2012) Is there no urban forestry in the developing globe? Sci Res Essays 7:3329–3335

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Shackleton CM (2021) Ecosystem provisioning services in Global South cities. In: Shackleton CM, Cilliers, SS, Davoren E, du Toit MJ (eds) Urban ecology in the Global South. Springer, Cham, pp 203–226

    Google Scholar

  • Shackleton CM, Cilliers SS, du Toit MJ, Davoren Eastward (2021) The demand for an urban ecology of the Global South. In: Shackleton CM, Cilliers, SS, Davoren E, du Toit MJ (eds). Urban ecology in the Global Due south. Springer, Cham, pp ane–26

    Google Scholar

  • Shackleton CM, Cocks ML (2021) Urban nature and biocultural realities. In: Cocks ML, Shackleton CM (eds) Diversities of nature in cities: enriching belonging, wellbeing and bioculture. Earthscan/Routledge, London, pp ane–24

    Google Scholar

  • Shackleton CM, Mograbi PJ (2020) Meeting a diverseness of needs through a diversity of species: urban residents' favourite and disliked tree species beyond eleven towns in South Africa and Zimbabwe. Urban For Urban Greenish 48:126507

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Shackleton CM, Njwaxu A (2021) Does the absenteeism of customs involvement underpin the demise of urban neighbourhood parks in the Eastern Cape, South Africa? Landsc Urb Programme 207: 104006

    Google Scholar

  • Shackleton CM, Shackleton RT (2016) Knowledge, perceptions and willingness to control designated invasive tree species in urban household gardens in S Africa. Biol Inv 18:1599–1609

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Shackleton CM, Guild J, Bromham B, Impey Southward, Jarrett M, Ngubane S, Steijl M (2017) How compatible are urban livestock and urban green spaces and trees? An assessment in a medium-sized South African town. Int J Urb Sustain Dev ix:243–252

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Shackleton CM, Ruwanza S, Sanni GS, Bennett S, De Lacy P, Modipa R, Mtati N, Sachikonye M, Thondhlana One thousand (2016) Unpacking Pandora'due south box: understanding and categorising ecosystem disservices for environmental management and man wellbeing. Ecosys nineteen:587–600

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Shackleton S, Chinyimba A, Hebinck P, Shackleton C, Kaoma H (2015) Multiple benefits and values of copse in urban landscapes in 2 towns in northern South Africa. Landsc Urb Plan 136:76–86

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Shapiro J, Báldi A (2014) Authentic accounting: how to balance ecosystem services and disservices. Ecosys Serv 7:201–202

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Sousa-Silva R, Smargiassi A, Paquette A, Kaiser D, Kneeshaw D (2020) Exactly what do nosotros know nigh tree pollen allergenicity? Lancet Respir Med 8:ten

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Speak A, Escobedo FJ, Russo A, Zerbe S (2018) An ecosystem service-disservice ratio: using blended indicators to assess the internet benefits of urban trees. Ecol Indic 95:544–553

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Sreetheran M, Van Den Bosch CCK (2014) A socio-ecological exploration of fear of crime in urban light-green spaces–a systematic review. Urban For Urban Green thirteen:i–18

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Sreetheran M, Van den Bosch CCK (2015) Fearfulness of crime in urban greenish spaces–what the residents of Kuala Lumpur take to say? Urban For Urban Green fourteen:702–713

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Ström G, Albihn A, Jinnerot T, Boqvist Due south, Andersson-Djurfeldt A, Sokerya Due south, Osbjer K, San S, Davun H, Magnusson U (2018) Manure direction and public wellness: Sanitary and socio-economical aspects amongst urban livestock-keepers in Cambodia. Sci Total Enviro 621:193–200

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Suchocka M, Jankowski P, Błaszczyk M (2019) Perception of urban trees by polish tree professionals vs. nonprofessionals. Sustain 11:211

    Google Scholar

  • TEEB (2010) The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: ecological and economical foundation. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar

  • Teixeira FZ, Bachi L, Blanco J, Zimmermann I, Welle I, Carvalho-Ribeiro SM (2019) Perceived ecosystem services (ES) and ecosystem disservices (EDS) from trees: insights from three case studies in Brazil and France. Landsc Ecol 34:1583–1600

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Tiwary A, Williams ID, Heidrich O, Namdeo A, Bandaru V, Calfapietra C (2016) Evolution of multi-functional streetscape light-green infrastructure using a performance alphabetize approach. Enviro Pollut 208:209–220

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Tobin MR, Goldshear JL, Toll LB, Graham JP, Leibler JH (2015) A framework to reduce infectious disease risk from urban poultry in the United States. Public Heal Rep 130:380–391

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Torres MN, Rodríguez JP, Leitão JP (2017) Geostatistical assay to place characteristics involved in sewer pipes and urban tree interactions. Urban For Urban Green 25:36–42

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Troy A, Grove JM, O'Neil-Dunne J (2012) The relationship between tree canopy and crime rates across an urban–rural gradient in the greater Baltimore region. Landsc Urb Plan 106:262–270

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Troy A, Nunery A, Grove JM (2016) The relationship betwixt residential 1000 management and neighborhood crime: an assay from Baltimore City and Canton. Landsc Urb Plan 147:78–87

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Tsopelas P, Santini A, Wingfield MJ, Wilhelm de Beer Z (2017) Canker stain: a lethal disease destroying iconic aeroplane copse. Plant Dis 101:645–658

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Tzoulas Thou, Korpela K, Venn S, Yli-Pelkonen V, Kaźmierczak A, Niemela J, James P (2007) Promoting ecosystem and man health in urban areas using Green Infrastructure: a literature review. Landsc Urb Program 81:167–178

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • UNICEF (2004) Fact sail: Malaria—a global crisis. https://www.unicef.org/media/media_20475.html. Accessed Feb 2020

  • Urquhart J, Potter C, Barnett J, Fellenor J, Mumford J, Quine CP (2017) Expert risk perceptions and the social amplification of gamble: a instance report in invasive tree pests and diseases. Enviro Sci Political leader 77:172–178

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Vaz AS, Kueffer C, Kull CA, Richardson DM, Vicente JR, Kühn I, Schröter M, Hauck J, Bonn A, Honrado JP (2017) Integrating ecosystem services and disservices: insights from plant invasions. Ecosys Serv 23:94–107

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Velasco-Jiménez MJ, Alcázar P, Cariñanos P, Galán C (2020) Allergenicity of the urban greenish areas in the city of Córdoba (Spain). Urban For Urban Green 49:126600

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Venter ZS, Shackleton CM, Van Staden F, Selomane O, Masterson VA (2020) Green Apartheid: Urban green infrastructure remains unequally distributed across income and race geographies in South Africa. Landsc Urb Plan 203:103889

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Villa F, Bagstad KJ, Voigt B, Johnson GW, Athanasiadis IN, Balbi S (2014) The misconception of ecosystem disservices: how a catchy term may yield the incorrect messages for science and society. Ecosys Serv x:52–53

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • von Döhren P, Haase D (2015) Ecosystem disservices research: a review of the state of the art with a focus on cities. Ecol Indic 52:490–497

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • von Döhren P, Haase D (2019) Risk assessment concerning urban ecosystem disservices: the example of street copse in Berlin. Frg. Ecosys Serv forty:101031

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Wang H-F, Qureshi S, Knapp S, Friedman CR, Hubacek K (2015) A basic cess of residential plant diversity and its ecosystem services and disservices in Beijing, China. Appl Geog 64:121–131

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Wenban-Smith H, Fasse A, Grote U (2016) Nutrient security in Tanzania: the challenge of rapid urbanisation. Food Sec 8:973–984

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Whelan CJ, Şekercioğlu ÇH, Wenny DG (2015) Why birds thing: from economic ornithology to ecosystem services. J Ornithol 156:227–238

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Wolfe MK, Mennis J (2012) Does vegetation encourage or suppress urban criminal offense? testify from Philadelphia, PA. Landsc Urb Programme 108:112–122

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • WHO (World Wellness Organisation) (2010) WHO guidelines for the production control and regulations of snake antivenom immunoglobulins. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar

  • Zhang W, Ricketts TH, Kremen C, Carney K, Swinton SM (2007) Ecosystem services and disservices to agronomics. Ecol Econ 64:253–260

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Zoeller KC, Gurney GG, Heydinger J, Cumming GS (2020) Defining cultural functional groups based on perceived traits assigned to birds. Ecosys Serv 44:101138

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Zuberbier T, Lötvall J, Simoens S, Subramanian SV, Church building MK (2014) Economic brunt of inadequate management of allergic diseases in the European union: a GA2LEN review. Allergy 69:1275–1279

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the S African Research Chairs Initiative of the Department of Science and Innovation and the National Research Foundation of South Africa (grant no. 84379). Whatsoever opinion, finding, determination or recommendation expressed in this fabric is that of the authors and the NRF does not accept any liability in this regard.

Writer data

Affiliations

  1. Section of Environmental Science, Rhodes Academy, Makhanda, 6140, S Africa

    Elandrie Davoren & Charlie M. Shackleton

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elandrie Davoren .

Copyright data

© 2021 The Author(due south), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

Well-nigh this affiliate

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Davoren, E., Shackleton, C.M. (2021). Urban Ecosystem Disservices in the Global South. In: Shackleton, C.1000., Cilliers, S.S., Davoren, E., du Toit, Grand.J. (eds) Urban Ecology in the Global S. Cities and Nature. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67650-6_11

Download citation

  • .RIS
  • .ENW
  • .BIB

  • DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67650-6_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-iii-030-67649-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-iii-030-67650-six

  • eBook Packages: History History (R0)

fuenteshork1964.blogspot.com

Source: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-67650-6_11

0 Response to "Ecosystem Disservices Research a Review of the State of the Art With a Focus on Cities"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel